What criteria did you use to identify/include the individuals from each stakeholder category after conducting the mapping?. [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. Status change from "under review" to "decision in process" to "with editor" again. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. For 21 days the manuscript status was "under consideration" Manuscript Under Editorial Consideration Nature Mason Jar Luminaries Tissue Paper Manuscript Under Editorial Consideration Nature. Have they appropriately validated the methods performance? Many papers are published online ahead of print publication date: corresponding authors of these papers will be informed by e-mail when the online publication date is confirmed, one week ahead of publication. The OA option will be offered to the author at the time the manuscript is submitted. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? For questions about submissions currently under editorial consideration please contact the journal Editorial Office at [emailprotected] For production enquiries please contact the journal Production Editor Allan Venida.. For general enquiries, please look at our support information.. For any other queries, contact the Open Research Support team. . "manuscript under editorial consideration" nature "manuscript under editorial consideration" nature. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' and JavaScript. The manuscript below has entered the review process. Direct transfer to Nature Communications was proposed. Invitation to Editors & Call for Manuscripts Nature methods how long does it take to publish a PNAS paper (direct submission)? Ultimately, encoding marginalia is a data-modeling question that asks us to rethink the nature and function of our texts and paratexts. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONEs publication criteria as it currently stands. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. In about one third of the cases (32%) authors had to wait 3 months or more and in 10% of the cases even more than 6 months before being informed. Formation of cafeteria intervention committee. Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. We look forward to your comments and remain with best regards; Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx, PONE-D-21-05456R1Stakeholder engagement in a hypertension and diabetes prevention research program Description and Lessons learnedPLOS ONE. It probably means nothing. In our project, the stakeholders contributed to the interpretation of qualitative data and the findings, similar to the study by Boote J et al [11]. //--> Southaven High School Bell Schedule, Samyang Dumplings Vegan, Charlie Mcdermott Sara Rejaie Wedding, Did Stephanie Nassar Know About Her Husband, Articles M